View Single Post
Old 01-21-2008, 08:20 PM   #7
VMT
Vinniebag'odonuts
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 55

Trader Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to VMT
I noticed a difference in the way the car sounded,even though the Flows and Mac are both chambered mufflers,the Mac is what they call a flow path design.We looked in the muffler before we installed it and it looked nothing like the Flow.I noticed a difference in the way my car breathed,it seemed to have more power,not labor as hard when your in 5th and you step on the gas to really accelerate.After we were done w/ the install and I left Chris's house,I got on 410 to head home.I shifted into third and let the engine wind to 4500rpms before I shifted up to 4th and 5th.Excellent power,no hesitation and the sound,deep,raspy,it filled the whole car w/a nice,loud roar..There is a distinct difference in the way the Mac and Flows sound,to me the Mac is a little deeper @ idle,it still pops or cackles,but not nearly as bad as the Flows I just removed.I like the sound.I had heard alot about Mac,good things,so I decided to try them out,I'm not one bit dissapointed,plus the Mac was the least expensive of all the catbacks I looked at and I looked at catbacks for a month before deciding to go w/ the Mac.I paid $283.00 plus $44.00 for shipping @ Speed concepts.Money well spent.Hope this helped in your decision.
VMT is offline   Reply With Quote