|
|
#1 |
|
WOOB WOOB WOOB WOOB NYRRK NYRRK NYRRK NYRRK
|
Cam Question?
A recently aquired a stock cam. I was told that it was from it wasfrom either 1989 or 1988 H.O. It was pitted really bad,and was unable to be polished.But they did have another one that they had let me have,that was in better condition,almost flawless..We matched them up together,and the lobes along with everything else looked pretty much the same. The only thing that i had noticed was that they had some casting numbers. The one that i had said [ZE],and the other one that i was given said [TE].Can anyone tell me what this may mean?? I was told that the stock 5.0 H.O. cams were similiar from 86-91 and they changed from 92 and up. So if i wanted to get one from a 92 or 93 H.O. for a 90 H.O. engine ,it will not work....Any help would be greatly appreciated...
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Back in the saddle again
|
they will all work,
what is your purpose, maybe i can give you some pointers. If I were building a trophy stock car, i would run an 88 ish HO cam or i would have one made by AFMif you want stock specs and maxed out, they will grind it out and still be class legal.
__________________
2007 Reflex Silver Wolfsburg Jetta - new hotness 1995 Canary Yellow GTS - Sold 12.81@106.2 w/1.80 60' Boltons/E303 + 3100 lbs + M&H 246 HP/ 290 TQ 12.57 @ 109.21 w/1.76 60' Boltons/GT40Ps/XE270 + 3240 lbs + 555Rs 295 HP / 321 TQ |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
WOOB WOOB WOOB WOOB NYRRK NYRRK NYRRK NYRRK
|
Well Ive got alot of internal head and intake work done. The short block is a rebuild that has not been bored..which is what i was looking for. the only thing my car is speed density..i,m not looking to change to mass air anytime soon...thats whay i needed a stock cam...I,m looking to make some pretty good power on a budget build.....i want an over all improvement of what these engines are really capable of, before i decide to put my kids up for sale to make more power.....Just kidding about my kids,but before i go and spend a Sh-t load of money,I want to see what i can do first.....
__________________
Last edited by thunderchicken; 04-14-2008 at 10:31 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
UT Sucks
|
I understand about not wanting to spend a ton of money on mass air but its not that expensive to switch the car over. All you need is a stock MAF (I am sure someone on here would give you one), the wiring harness conversion kit (MAWH) is pretty cheap as well, and then all you need to do is scrounge up a PCM or EEC (whatever you want to call it). I would say total investment would be less than $200 and you have a much more flexible engine management system and can get a better cam.
Another source of used car parts if your local salvage yard is picked clean is Car-Part.com--Used Auto Parts Market. Darren
__________________
'83 5.8L TKO'd T-Bird on the bottle '93 5.0L Mustang coupe that beat your mom's LTD |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
LSS Sponsor
![]() |
The cam should work, the main reason for not installing an aftermarket cam with speed density is most cams will cause you to loose manifold vacuum. Speed density systems use a MAP sensor to determine load. If you loose manifold vacuum the computer will add fuel thinking the engine is under a load. You should get the same manifold vacuum with any stock H.O. cam. I looked at the specs. The main difference is the intake lobe has 4 degrees more duration on the MAF cars. The MAF cams are are also retarded 2 degrees from the speed density cams. You could degree the cam with the speed density intake center line, 2 degrees is not going to make much difference, but retarding the cam will loose some manifold vacuum. Probably not enough to be a problem. I have hooked vacuum gages to both speed density cars and MAF cars I don't remember any vacuum differences.
__________________
The goal is to get the car to run 10.0 on radials,with out a power adder and still be streetable. My car is an '85 sonic blue coupe with 302 bored and stroked to 364, Ported Twisted Wedge heads and a BXR intake, A9M ECM with a Tweecer, C4 with trans brake, Hoosier 275/60/15 drag radials, no power adders. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Back in the saddle again
|
what intake are you running? I would pop the cam in and retard it depending on what intake you have. stock e7s?
__________________
2007 Reflex Silver Wolfsburg Jetta - new hotness 1995 Canary Yellow GTS - Sold 12.81@106.2 w/1.80 60' Boltons/E303 + 3100 lbs + M&H 246 HP/ 290 TQ 12.57 @ 109.21 w/1.76 60' Boltons/GT40Ps/XE270 + 3240 lbs + 555Rs 295 HP / 321 TQ |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
WOOB WOOB WOOB WOOB NYRRK NYRRK NYRRK NYRRK
|
Stock intake,all runners have been enlarged,aswell as the the throttle body area has been enlarged to 68 mm from 58 mm,and the E7's has had all the intake runners enlarged to match the lower intake manifold that has also had the runners enlarged,and the heads have a stage 2 port. the heads have GT-40 stainless steel valves with 600 lift springs,and the exhaust ports have been enlarged with the humps removed. And they have also been milled 30 thousanths to increase compression...
__________________
Last edited by thunderchicken; 04-15-2008 at 09:21 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
looks mean, workin' on the fast
|
not sure what you're gonna do but 95gts mentioned 88 ho cam a good stock cam, i've got one you can have for $10.. i'm coming to san antonio thursday/friday if you're interested... pulled it out of my 88 project motor.
__________________
t-5 swap, billit quadrant, upr firewall adjuster, steeda tri-ax, custom jb tool and fab one off subframe connectors, 8.8 w/posi and 4.10's with 5 lug axles, tubular upper control arms, southside lowers, and pbr twin piston front calipers with "snowflake" wheels |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
WOOB WOOB WOOB WOOB NYRRK NYRRK NYRRK NYRRK
|
Quote:
...thank you for the link,it looks like it will be very helpful....
__________________
Last edited by thunderchicken; 04-15-2008 at 09:12 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Back in the saddle again
|
sounds good, just pop some 1.7 rockers on there with that stock cam.
__________________
2007 Reflex Silver Wolfsburg Jetta - new hotness 1995 Canary Yellow GTS - Sold 12.81@106.2 w/1.80 60' Boltons/E303 + 3100 lbs + M&H 246 HP/ 290 TQ 12.57 @ 109.21 w/1.76 60' Boltons/GT40Ps/XE270 + 3240 lbs + 555Rs 295 HP / 321 TQ |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
WOOB WOOB WOOB WOOB NYRRK NYRRK NYRRK NYRRK
|
Thanks david,but i already aquired one...i'm just trying to see if there is away to tell from what year my cam is from....
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
WOOB WOOB WOOB WOOB NYRRK NYRRK NYRRK NYRRK
|
I am thinking about sticking with 1.7's,i also would'nt 1.6's,for now...i had also heard that if i go with 1.72's,with speed density,i may have driveability problems because of the higher lift...there may just be a chance....but i'm working on that at this moment....
__________________
Last edited by thunderchicken; 04-15-2008 at 09:23 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
WOOB WOOB WOOB WOOB NYRRK NYRRK NYRRK NYRRK
|
Well i finally got the answers that i was looking for,when i posted this thread,The 5.0 H.O. cam that has ZE castings is the H.O. cam,and the the one that i have that has the casting TE Is an explorer cam...If anyboy else knew that,cool...But thats new info for me,and anybody else who has ever been wondering.......
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|