DYNOED THE MACH not impressed

USMCBULLIT · 06-08-2008, 10:53 PM

I was attending a car show and there was dyno there. I paid 75 bucks for 3 runs. This was the first time ever getting a mustang dynoed better yet a mach 1. It was not the dyno chasis. It was the one that they unbolt the wheels and attach it to there machines on each side. One of there portable ones that they take around alot. Not sure which one is better but just wanted to get it tuned. There was no Air fuel ratio so that sucked because I couldnt see what air fuel ratio I was at. Well I got 3 pulls and this was the outcome. Not to happy with it either so I hope it was off. 349 HP flywheel SAE corrected and 329 tourqe? so is that about 270 to the wheels and 329 tourqe to the wheels? I have posted the 2 sheets that I recieved from them. The only mods I have on the car are jegs off road h pipe, flowmaster 40 series, jlt cold air intake, FRPP aluminum drive shaft and thats it. The car is a 04 Mach 1 5 speed with 27k miles.

04Roush2 · 06-08-2008, 10:55 PM

I've never seen that kinda dyno before. Got any pics or vids of the runs? And yeah, those numbers seem a lil low.

USMCBULLIT · 06-08-2008, 11:11 PM

I think i might have a picture of what the dyno was taken on. I'll have to post it on here.

USMCBULLIT · 06-08-2008, 11:15 PM

here is what it looked like. They attach it to there system and make 3 runs in 4th gear.

aguilarf · 06-08-2008, 11:34 PM

Sounds like a DynoPack system.

Mustangworld Dynopack dyno

04Roush2 · 06-08-2008, 11:41 PM

That's interesting. Never seen anything like it before. How safe is it?

USMCBULLIT · 06-09-2008, 12:02 AM

so are is that pretty accurate then? As far as all 3 runs they were all in 4th gear and just seem low to me was looking around 285+rwhp for the mach 1

2k4mk1 · 06-09-2008, 06:24 AM

Depending on how hot and humid it was when done you are not to far off for your car with the mods you have .....

See below:

95 GTS · 06-09-2008, 01:59 PM

all dynoes are different. First off I have never seen one of those printed in fly wheel HP.

dynopacks measure the hp at the hub and measure high normally. this is due to a few reasons, one which includes the lack of wheels sucking up HP.

do not pay any attention to the numbers you got as they have no baring whatsoever on what you would expect on a normal dyno.

you can go get a few pulls with A/f for cheaper than that almost anywhere.

**Sonic Blue 85** · 06-09-2008, 06:24 PM

The numbers don't look that far off to me. Do you know the aproximate altitude where the car was dynoed? I would gess Nebraska could have some high altitude, that would lower the numbers. Then the humidity should be a lot lower and the temps lower than they are hear in central Texas, that would be two things in your favor. The mods you have made are not going to make a big difference in power over stock and you do not seem to have had it tuned, so I would say the numbers are probably close.

95 GTS · 06-09-2008, 07:36 PM

95 GTS · 06-09-2008, 07:48 PM

OK, here is the deal. a dynapack will dyno about 4-5% higher than a dyno jet roughly.
This dyno operator also included a rediculously high TCF which is the correction factor to take give the fly wheel HP.

1.3 is the factor which is beyond any driveline loss you will see on a stock mach 1.

Your numbers are all BS. if you give us your exact mods we could probably give you a more accurate estimate of the power you have

btw, are you auto or 5 speed?

311-420 · 06-28-2008, 05:36 PM

i would say you're in the 285-290rwhp zone.

that dyno looks a little sketchy from over here. dont sweat those numbers dude. head over to the registry if you havent already.

06-08-2008, 10:53 PM	#1
USMCBULLIT Registered User Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: S.Sioux City, Nebraska Posts: 66 Trader Rating: (0)	DYNOED THE MACH not impressed I was attending a car show and there was dyno there. I paid 75 bucks for 3 runs. This was the first time ever getting a mustang dynoed better yet a mach 1. It was not the dyno chasis. It was the one that they unbolt the wheels and attach it to there machines on each side. One of there portable ones that they take around alot. Not sure which one is better but just wanted to get it tuned. There was no Air fuel ratio so that sucked because I couldnt see what air fuel ratio I was at. Well I got 3 pulls and this was the outcome. Not to happy with it either so I hope it was off. 349 HP flywheel SAE corrected and 329 tourqe? so is that about 270 to the wheels and 329 tourqe to the wheels? I have posted the 2 sheets that I recieved from them. The only mods I have on the car are jegs off road h pipe, flowmaster 40 series, jlt cold air intake, FRPP aluminum drive shaft and thats it. The car is a 04 Mach 1 5 speed with 27k miles. Attached Thumbnails

06-08-2008, 11:15 PM	#4
USMCBULLIT Registered User Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: S.Sioux City, Nebraska Posts: 66 Trader Rating: (0)	here is what it looked like. They attach it to there system and make 3 runs in 4th gear. Attached Thumbnails

06-08-2008, 11:34 PM	#5
aguilarf 2001 Oxford White Mustang GT Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 591 Trader Rating: (9)	Sounds like a DynoPack system. Mustangworld Dynopack dyno __________________

06-09-2008, 06:24 AM	#8
2k4mk1 My name is ED,My mom calls me special,I dont know why? Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: SanAntonio Posts: 6,214 Trader Rating: (2)	Depending on how hot and humid it was when done you are not to far off for your car with the mods you have ..... See below: __________________ 04 Oxford White MACH1,5 SPD with IUP,K&NAircharger Borla Stingers,SLP Catted X pipe,Tri-ax,SCT Flashtune,Max Mtr Spt 4 bolt adj C/C plates, Drilled/Slotted rotors all 4 corners 281 rwhp on Mustang Dyno,306 rwhp on a Dynojet 94 Black Lightning Daily Driver&85GT FACH1 Project under construction

06-09-2008, 01:59 PM	#9
95 GTS Back in the saddle again Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Texas Posts: 1,492 Trader Rating: (0)	all dynoes are different. First off I have never seen one of those printed in fly wheel HP. dynopacks measure the hp at the hub and measure high normally. this is due to a few reasons, one which includes the lack of wheels sucking up HP. do not pay any attention to the numbers you got as they have no baring whatsoever on what you would expect on a normal dyno. you can go get a few pulls with A/f for cheaper than that almost anywhere. __________________ 2007 Reflex Silver Wolfsburg Jetta - new hotness 1995 Canary Yellow GTS - Sold 12.81@106.2 w/1.80 60' Boltons/E303 + 3100 lbs + M&H 246 HP/ 290 TQ 12.57 @ 109.21 w/1.76 60' Boltons/GT40Ps/XE270 + 3240 lbs + 555Rs 295 HP / 321 TQ

06-08-2008, 11:11 PM	#3
USMCBULLIT Registered User Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: S.Sioux City, Nebraska Posts: 66 Trader Rating: (0)	I think i might have a picture of what the dyno was taken on. I'll have to post it on here.

06-09-2008, 12:02 AM	#7
USMCBULLIT Registered User Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: S.Sioux City, Nebraska Posts: 66 Trader Rating: (0)	so are is that pretty accurate then? As far as all 3 runs they were all in 4th gear and just seem low to me was looking around 285+rwhp for the mach 1

06-09-2008, 06:24 PM	#10
Sonic Blue 85 LSS Sponsor Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: New Braunfels Posts: 275 Trader Rating: (1)	The numbers don't look that far off to me. Do you know the aproximate altitude where the car was dynoed? I would gess Nebraska could have some high altitude, that would lower the numbers. Then the humidity should be a lot lower and the temps lower than they are hear in central Texas, that would be two things in your favor. The mods you have made are not going to make a big difference in power over stock and you do not seem to have had it tuned, so I would say the numbers are probably close. __________________ The goal is to get the car to run 10.0 on radials,with out a power adder and still be streetable. My car is an '85 sonic blue coupe with 302 bored and stroked to 364, Ported Twisted Wedge heads and a BXR intake, A9M ECM with a Tweecer, C4 with trans brake, Hoosier 275/60/15 drag radials, no power adders.

06-09-2008, 07:36 PM	#11
95 GTS Back in the saddle again Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Texas Posts: 1,492 Trader Rating: (0)	. __________________ 2007 Reflex Silver Wolfsburg Jetta - new hotness 1995 Canary Yellow GTS - Sold 12.81@106.2 w/1.80 60' Boltons/E303 + 3100 lbs + M&H 246 HP/ 290 TQ 12.57 @ 109.21 w/1.76 60' Boltons/GT40Ps/XE270 + 3240 lbs + 555Rs 295 HP / 321 TQ Last edited by 95 GTS; 06-09-2008 at 07:49 PM.

06-09-2008, 07:48 PM	#12
95 GTS Back in the saddle again Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Texas Posts: 1,492 Trader Rating: (0)	OK, here is the deal. a dynapack will dyno about 4-5% higher than a dyno jet roughly. This dyno operator also included a rediculously high TCF which is the correction factor to take give the fly wheel HP. 1.3 is the factor which is beyond any driveline loss you will see on a stock mach 1. Your numbers are all BS. if you give us your exact mods we could probably give you a more accurate estimate of the power you have btw, are you auto or 5 speed? __________________ 2007 Reflex Silver Wolfsburg Jetta - new hotness 1995 Canary Yellow GTS - Sold 12.81@106.2 w/1.80 60' Boltons/E303 + 3100 lbs + M&H 246 HP/ 290 TQ 12.57 @ 109.21 w/1.76 60' Boltons/GT40Ps/XE270 + 3240 lbs + 555Rs 295 HP / 321 TQ

06-28-2008, 05:36 PM	#13
311-420 you smell that?! Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: in between colleges Posts: 4,121 Trader Rating: (0)	i would say you're in the 285-290rwhp zone. that dyno looks a little sketchy from over here. dont sweat those numbers dude. head over to the registry if you havent already. __________________ 94 Steeda- sold- 355rwhp on a 75 02 Roush 360R- sold- 400rwhp at 8psi 04 Mach 1- K&N drop-in, Steeda tri-ax, Pypes o/r X, Super 44s, 04 IRS

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread: