|
|
#1 |
|
91mustang5.0j
|
e303 or f303 which 1 should i order?
well my x cam pooped on me its rounded off so that explains lack of performance ! just ordered new comp cam lifters ! just wondering if any1 has had these cams an wat they did an didnt like about them im going to order my cam first thing in the morning an want to know which 1 i should get my mods are
92 roller block stock heads weiland high rize intake 600 holley 4 brrl carb shorty headers 40';s flows 410's with a 8.8 i will be droppin in the next mnth i already have comp cam hyrdaulic roller lifters 1.6 roller rockers t5, blue thunder shifter from upr holley blue fuel pump o/r x pipe an thats about it now which cam should i get thanks
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Leaving July 3rd for the Army
|
e303, the f cam is bigger and you don't need it being you have stock heads
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Leaving July 3rd for the Army
|
well, if you plan on getting a nice set of heads, and are for sure, get the f cam.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
91mustang5.0j
|
wil the e303 run well with those heads to though ive herd the e303 has great bottom power an the ff303 has good power at midrange/top end! i wanna get the right cam have you ran any of these cams
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Leaving July 3rd for the Army
|
both cams are great, but depends what you want out of your car.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
LSS Sponsor
![]() |
TFS stg 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Back in the saddle again
|
none are very good for your combo.
go with the e303 and 1.7s
__________________
2007 Reflex Silver Wolfsburg Jetta - new hotness 1995 Canary Yellow GTS - Sold 12.81@106.2 w/1.80 60' Boltons/E303 + 3100 lbs + M&H 246 HP/ 290 TQ 12.57 @ 109.21 w/1.76 60' Boltons/GT40Ps/XE270 + 3240 lbs + 555Rs 295 HP / 321 TQ |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
91mustang5.0j
|
just ordered the e303 hopeing it works out good ill keep yall posted im aput up a video when its all back together to let yall know how its sounds alot of poeple told me to go with the e303
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
What ever combo you get when you decide to purchase heads... make certain you get a cam that will not create valve clearance issues. You don't want to screw up you new heads with to large of a cam... unless you decide to have the pistons flycut to match the required valve clearance. Good Luck!
__________________
Modz Update!!! WTB: I need the following parts for my '94 Stang. PM me if you have any one of the listed components laying around or know someone that does.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
LSS Sponsor
![]() |
I would have went with the TFS 1 due to the split duration on it . Factory heads need more exhaust duration to help get the gases out .
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
LSS Sponsor
![]() |
Its a pretty mild cam and will peter out about 5200-5600 rpms with good springs . Power wise , it really depends on what you have and can make within that rpm range . I'd say 350 flywheel hp N/A tops with a good set of heads and intake on a 302.
The FMS letter cams were the shit 15 years ago . Now days there are many better choices but they cost a little more . I know BHAM on here claims to have ran high 12's on a bone stock 302 with a custom flat tappet cam . I would think a cam similiar in a hydraulic roller grind should run even better . Last edited by thesource; 05-22-2008 at 08:37 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
LSS Sponsor
![]() |
i've run high 12s back in the day with a stone stock long block with a STOCK cam just retatrded 3 degrees so thats not a big feat using a aftermarket cam.
__________________
PSI Performance Solutions 210-655-6546 10811 nacogdoches road San Antonio TX 78217 cmr tuners and full service performance shop. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|